Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/whats-new/latest-activity?before_id=100222
        )
    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030770
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )
    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
 			
		
		
			You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, 
join our community today ! 
		
 
		
		
	
		
		
		
		
	
		
	
		
		
	JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
 
		
	You are using an out of date browser. It  may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an 
alternative browser .
 
		
			
	
		
		
			
			
				
				
	
	
	
		
			
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			C  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	If Intel did not have a solid business justification for building fabs in the US, including Fab 52 and Fab 62, then it should not have...
	Saturday at 7:59 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
If Intel did not have a solid business justification for building fabs in the US, including Fab 52 and Fab 62, then it should not have...
Saturday at 7:50 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			B  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	Why not also sovle the time travel problem at the same time?
	Saturday at 7:43 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			S  
		 
		 
		
			
It was not so much not wanting to meet the milestones as it was they lacked the business needed to warrant the milestones.
As CHIPs was...
Saturday at 6:56 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			B  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	I'm only guessing, but I suspect LBT may be buying a team more than a design.
	Saturday at 6:41 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
Yes,  this can be interpreted in two different ways.
My view:
The US government didn’t fully trust that Intel would refrain from using...
Saturday at 5:58 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			D  
		 
		 
		
			
Why not also sovle the time travel problem at the same time?
Saturday at 5:57 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
It's hard to tell -- there is entanglement though of some kind, per Semianalysis:
" Note we have worked with Substrate since as far...
Saturday at 4:53 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
Is SambaNova revenue above $100M yet? Has anybody heard? Must be nice to have a $5B valuation with $100M in revenue. :cool:
Saturday at 4:50 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	Did I understand this correctly, is Dylan Patel of Semianalysis part of the fraud? I can't wait until part II.
	Saturday at 4:47 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			B  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	Ebeam lithography and multi-beam has been in existence for years (maybe decades) but they are used to make masks not chips.
If the...
	Saturday at 4:29 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
Or maybe because the SambaNova Chairman is also the CEO of Intel?  :ROFLMAO:
Saturday at 4:17 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			M  
		 
		 
		
			
He must have been taking lessons from the POTUS :rolleyes:
Saturday at 4:17 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			  
		 
		 
		
			
	
	SambaNova must be very desperate to sell if they agree to be acquired by Intel ::))
	Saturday at 4:17 PM 
		 
	 
	 
				
					
	
		
	
		
			
			M  
		 
		 
		
			
SambaNova must be very desperate to sell if they agree to be acquired by Intel ::))
Saturday at 4:15 PM