Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/memory-prices-surge-up-to-90-from-q4-2025.24500/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030871
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Memory Prices Surge Up to 90% From Q4 2025

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
  • 1770319110838.png
  • Memory prices have soared 80%-90% in Q1 2026 so far compared to Q4 2025, with DRAM, NAND and HBM all hitting record-breaking highs.
  • To mitigate cost pressures, OEMs are reducing memory content per device or prioritizing premium lineups equipped with LPDDR5, where price pressure is relatively manageable.

  • Conventional DRAM margins surpassed HBM in Q4 2025, while manufacturer operating margins are expected to hit historic peaks with record-breaking earnings in Q1 2026.
Seoul, Beijing, Berlin, Buenos Aires, Fort Collins, Hong Kong, London, New Delhi, Taipei, Tokyo – Feb 5, 2026

Memory prices have risen by 80%-90% QoQ in Q1 2026 so far, according to the February issue of Counterpoint’s Memory Price Tracker, marking an unprecedented and record-breaking surge. The primary driver of this rise is the sharp price increase in general-purpose server DRAM. Furthermore, NAND, which was relatively quiet in Q4, is also seeing a parallel jump of 80%-90% in the first quarter. Combined with the rising prices of some HBM3e products, the market is witnessing a full-throttle upward trend across all segments.

In server-grade memory, for instance, the price of 64GB RDIMM has surged from a fixed contract price of $450 in the fourth quarter to over $900 in the first quarter, and it appears likely to surpass the $1,000 mark in the second quarter.

Senior Analyst Jeongku Choi emphasized, “For device manufacturers, this is a double whammy – rising component costs and weakened consumer purchasing power will likely slow the demand as the quarter progresses. This calls for OEMs to change procurement patterns or focus on premium models to justify the higher price by delivering more value to consumers.”

Smartphone manufacturers are reducing the DRAM content or substituting TLC SSDs with more cost-effective QLC alternatives. Simultaneously, there is a clear trend of declining orders for LPDDR4, which is currently in short supply, and increasing orders for LPDDR5, supported by the rollout of new entry-level chipsets that are compatible with the latest DRAM standard.

Choi further noted, “The memory profitability is expected to reach unprecedented levels. DRAM operating margins have already reached the 60% range in Q4 2025, marking the first time margins for general-purpose DRAM have surpassed those of HBM. The first quarter of 2026 is set to be the period where DRAM margins exceed their historical peaks for the first time. Having said that, this will either set a new normal or a very high bar which looks solid now but could make the next down cycle (if there is one) look uglier.”

 
The chart above actually shows the *best* case price increase (from a consumer viewpoint) on the PC side. A DDR4 DIMM that is 8GB in size -- is a configuration in relative low demand.

From what I've been reading -- Retail DDR4 prices overall are up about 2X from their lows in 1H 2025, while PC DDR5 prices are up more like 4X (300%). The top end DDR5 kits (64GB per DIMM) are often 5-6X above their lows.
 
The chart above actually shows the *best* case price increase (from a consumer viewpoint) on the PC side. A DDR4 DIMM that is 8GB in size -- is a configuration in relative low demand.

From what I've been reading -- Retail DDR4 prices overall are up about 2X from their lows in 1H 2025, while PC DDR5 prices are up more like 4X (300%). The top end DDR5 kits (64GB per DIMM) are often 5-6X above their lows.
So we already know how much prices went up in Q4 for ASP. This is the price memory companies received in Q4. DRAM increased 30% including DDR4, DDR5, HBM (NAND showed similar price increase)

Are these numbers for actual sales price received by memory companies in Q1 or are they for quotes issued in Q1 for the future? Do you think memory ASP prices reported in Q1 earnings will be 90% higher than Q4 2025?

Couple issues we are seeing:
1) Memory output, bits will increase about 20-25% in 2026. it doesnt matter what people want, that is going to be the number. So saying demand or builds is skyrocketing is not useful. Demand could increase 100% or 200% and it doesnt matter.
2) The price that some people (not all) are willing to pay is skyrocketing. But everyone will still be short to what they want.
3) People getting cut off in multiple markets. Many people will not get memory they need at any price. They will flatten or lower shipments of modules.
4) As a result spot price is also fairly meaningless (no volume at that spot price).

The Key is: What is the impact when certain companies do not get memory and therefore lower overall builds (Qualcomm presented first warning).

What will the "new equilibrium" bring? PCs and phones flatten or lower memory content? Or sell less PCs and Phones? Hyperscalers have tons of money. PC OEMS, Phone OEMs do not.
 
Named companies with reported prepayments/forward deals
• Nvidia – HBM prepayments - Nvidia has been described as placing large prepayments with Micron and SK hynix to secure future HBM output, shifting supplier payment cycles in its favor and squeezing smartphone OEMs and others. Industry coverage also notes that SK hynix booked nearly all of its 2026 HBM wafer output by mid‑2025, with Nvidia as the key anchor customer, implying multi‑year capacity commitments rather than spot buys.
• OpenAI – very large DRAM wafer contracts - In late 2025, OpenAI signed deals with Samsung and SK hynix to purchase up to 900,000 DRAM wafers per month, roughly 40% of global DRAM output, for its “Stargate” initiative. These were structured as long‑term wafer‑level procurement contracts—effectively taking capacity off the open market and functioning as massive pre‑buys of future DRAM production.
• Hyperscalers and other cloud/AI players (less specific). Industry analyses describe “hyperscalers and smartphone OEMs” (Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, ByteDance, Apple, etc.) signing multi‑year supply and capacity agreements that “lock in significant slices of DRAM and NAND output,” with memory makers prioritizing customers willing to commit to long‑term volume.

Reports on the HBM market note that SK hynix, Samsung, and Micron have all delivered HBM4 samples to major customers and are negotiating multi‑year supply contracts for 12‑Hi and 16‑Hi HBM4 targeted at Nvidia and other AI chip vendors.

What’s known versus inferred
• Public sources directly name Nvidia (HBM prepayments), OpenAI (huge DRAM wafer commitments), and “hyperscalers/smartphone OEMs” in aggregate, but do not always disclose individual contract terms for Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, etc.
• Memory makers themselves (SK hynix, Samsung, Micron) describe their HBM production for 2024–2026 as “sold out” or largely allocated, implying forward contracts and/or prepayments with their largest AI and cloud customers, even when the buyers aren’t named.
 
Couple issues we are seeing:
1) Memory output, bits will increase about 20-25% in 2026. it doesnt matter what people want, that is going to be the number. So saying demand or builds is skyrocketing is not useful. Demand could increase 100% or 200% and it doesnt matter.
2) The price that some people (not all) are willing to pay is skyrocketing. But everyone will still be short to what they want.
3) People getting cut off in multiple markets. Many people will not get memory they need at any price. They will flatten or lower shipments of modules.
4) As a result spot price is also fairly meaningless (no volume at that spot price).

The Key is: What is the impact when certain companies do not get memory and therefore lower overall builds (Qualcomm presented first warning).

What will the "new equilibrium" bring? PCs and phones flatten or lower memory content? Or sell less PCs and Phones? Hyperscalers have tons of money. PC OEMS, Phone OEMs do not.

Great synopsis and questions. I can't see PC, Phones, and (price sensitive) edge devices continuing in the volumes they've been doing, a PC-recession is coming.

Also - if/when a bubble pops, what's the reverse reaction at that point - Who could be positioned to take advantage of this?
 
Back
Top