You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
I think what LPT is doing is correct. Once the workforce is reduced. They have to come up with innovative ways to compensate for the change and hence driving up efficiency. It should happen for both fabs and non-fabs in short term, medium term, and long term, hence a continuous trend.
Nope, my info is second hand. I have spoken to people who have had discussions with the analysts brought in to help benchmark Intel against TSMC. Take that for whatever it is worth.
Interesting, the benchmarking of TSMC and Intel Foundry is not only node against node for the customer stakeholders, but also #people & #robots for the Wall Street stakeholders. Many business books / academic papers will be written the coming years about this Chips Battle.......
Regarding cultural change/transformation, I wonder if these analysts, mentioned above by Artificer60, are McKinsey's?
Hitting Intel would be the fastest way for Iran to get the US directly and overtly involved. I can’t imagine that would help what they’re trying to achieve, but war is sometimes crazy. Hope it does not happen.
Hitting Intel would be the fastest way for Iran to get the US directly and overtly involved. I can’t imagine that would help what they’re trying to achieve, but war is sometimes crazy. Hope it does not happen.
Absolutely, I have a lot of friends working in on and in that fab. Work is stressful enough under normal conditions, I can't imagine going in on a war footing.
Iran does seem to be fighting an economic war, they are targeting the port at Haifa. Though as you said hitting intel would definitely be considered an attack on 'US interests in the region.'