Semiwiki on LinkedIn Semiwiki on Facebook Semiwiki on Twitter Register / Log in 
Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/how-does-the-hbf-vs-xpoint-technology.25253/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2031070
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

How does the HBF vs Xpoint technology

skybluega said:
Dear experts, I am wondering how the HBF compared with the discontinued intel Xpoint technology?
Click to expand...

HBM correct?

HBM is designed to feed GPUs with enormous amounts of data, reaching bandwidth in the terabytes-per-second range. That's why NVIDIA's AI systems and AMD's Instinct accelerators rely on HBM. Optane Persistent Memory was much slower. Real measurements found read latency around 374 ns and bandwidth around 38 GB/s for reads, which is probably why Optane is dead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top