Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/china-condemns-us-move-to-revoke-semiconductor-waivers-for-intel-china-samsung-sk-hynix.23503/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

China condemns US move to revoke semiconductor waivers for Intel China, Samsung, SK Hynix

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member

The US Department of Commerce announced on Friday that Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Co Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co Ltd, and SK Hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd would be removed from the VEU list. The decision effectively eliminates a mechanism that allowed the firms to import certain chipmaking equipment without repeatedly applying for licenses.​


China condemns US move to revoke semiconductor waivers for Intel, Samsung, SK Hynix


China’s Ministry of Commerce has condemned Washington’s decision to revoke “validated end-user” (VEU) authorizations for three semiconductor companies operating in China, calling the move a misuse of export controls that threatens global supply chains. In a statement issued on Saturday night, Beijing urged the United States to “immediately correct its wrongdoings” and safeguard the security of global industrial systems.

The US Department of Commerce announced on Friday that Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Co Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co Ltd, and SK Hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd would be removed from the VEU list. The decision effectively eliminates a mechanism that allowed the firms to import certain chipmaking equipment without repeatedly applying for licenses.

China warns of global consequences

A ministry spokesperson said the US action, “driven by self-interest,” has turned export controls into a political weapon. The measure, they added, will have a “serious negative impact on the stability of the global semiconductor industry and supply chains.”

“Semiconductors are a highly globalized sector shaped over decades by market forces and business choices,” the spokesperson said, stressing that Beijing will take “necessary measures to firmly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of its enterprises.”

What do we know about VEU system?

The VEU system dates back to 2023, when the Biden administration granted South Korean chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix indefinite exemptions from broader restrictions that bar the export of advanced chipmaking equipment to China. These waivers were seen as a pragmatic step, allowing the firms to sustain and expand their major operations in the world’s largest semiconductor market.

By revoking the waivers, Washington has signaled that it wants to close what it views as loopholes in export controls. The US Commerce Department stated that it had “no intention of granting licenses that would allow companies to expand capacity or upgrade technology” at their manufacturing facilities in China.

Impact on South Korean chipmakers

The decision poses risks for Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, both of which rely heavily on China for memory chip production. These components are essential for smartphones, laptops, and other consumer electronics, much of which are assembled in China.

In a statement, SK Hynix said it would maintain close communication with both the South Korean and US governments to minimize the impact on its operations. Samsung has not yet issued a formal response.
The announcement also affects a former Intel unit in Dalian, now owned by SK Hynix. Under the new rules, the companies have 120 days before the waivers expire, after which they must apply for individual licenses to continue importing necessary equipment.

US justification

According to Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, the step is part of a broader effort to tighten export controls that, in Washington’s view, had disadvantaged American firms. “The Trump administration is committed to closing export control loopholes particularly those that put US companies at a competitive disadvantage,” Kessler said.

Officials argue that the previous waivers effectively supported foreign competitors without yielding reciprocal benefits for US manufacturers. The decision is intended to limit Beijing’s ability to access advanced technologies while bolstering America’s strategic edge in semiconductor innovation.

The revocation highlights the intensifying struggle over semiconductors, a sector central to military, economic, and technological power. China views the move as part of Washington’s broader strategy to contain its rise in advanced technology, while the US insists the restrictions are vital to protect national security and competitiveness.

 

The US Department of Commerce announced on Friday that Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Co Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co Ltd, and SK Hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd would be removed from the VEU list. The decision effectively eliminates a mechanism that allowed the firms to import certain chipmaking equipment without repeatedly applying for licenses.​


China condemns US move to revoke semiconductor waivers for Intel, Samsung, SK Hynix


China’s Ministry of Commerce has condemned Washington’s decision to revoke “validated end-user” (VEU) authorizations for three semiconductor companies operating in China, calling the move a misuse of export controls that threatens global supply chains. In a statement issued on Saturday night, Beijing urged the United States to “immediately correct its wrongdoings” and safeguard the security of global industrial systems.

The US Department of Commerce announced on Friday that Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Co Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co Ltd, and SK Hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd would be removed from the VEU list. The decision effectively eliminates a mechanism that allowed the firms to import certain chipmaking equipment without repeatedly applying for licenses.

China warns of global consequences

A ministry spokesperson said the US action, “driven by self-interest,” has turned export controls into a political weapon. The measure, they added, will have a “serious negative impact on the stability of the global semiconductor industry and supply chains.”

“Semiconductors are a highly globalized sector shaped over decades by market forces and business choices,” the spokesperson said, stressing that Beijing will take “necessary measures to firmly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of its enterprises.”

What do we know about VEU system?

The VEU system dates back to 2023, when the Biden administration granted South Korean chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix indefinite exemptions from broader restrictions that bar the export of advanced chipmaking equipment to China. These waivers were seen as a pragmatic step, allowing the firms to sustain and expand their major operations in the world’s largest semiconductor market.

By revoking the waivers, Washington has signaled that it wants to close what it views as loopholes in export controls. The US Commerce Department stated that it had “no intention of granting licenses that would allow companies to expand capacity or upgrade technology” at their manufacturing facilities in China.

Impact on South Korean chipmakers

The decision poses risks for Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, both of which rely heavily on China for memory chip production. These components are essential for smartphones, laptops, and other consumer electronics, much of which are assembled in China.

In a statement, SK Hynix said it would maintain close communication with both the South Korean and US governments to minimize the impact on its operations. Samsung has not yet issued a formal response.
The announcement also affects a former Intel unit in Dalian, now owned by SK Hynix. Under the new rules, the companies have 120 days before the waivers expire, after which they must apply for individual licenses to continue importing necessary equipment.

US justification

According to Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, the step is part of a broader effort to tighten export controls that, in Washington’s view, had disadvantaged American firms. “The Trump administration is committed to closing export control loopholes particularly those that put US companies at a competitive disadvantage,” Kessler said.

Officials argue that the previous waivers effectively supported foreign competitors without yielding reciprocal benefits for US manufacturers. The decision is intended to limit Beijing’s ability to access advanced technologies while bolstering America’s strategic edge in semiconductor innovation.

The revocation highlights the intensifying struggle over semiconductors, a sector central to military, economic, and technological power. China views the move as part of Washington’s broader strategy to contain its rise in advanced technology, while the US insists the restrictions are vital to protect national security and competitiveness.


I thought Intel already sold its Dalian China fab to SK hynix several years ago.
 
Does it also includes TSMC? Or they are still exempted?

I was surprised TSMC was not mentioned. TSMC has two fabs in China and they are doing some equipment updates according to 2025 CAPEX. But yes, CC Wei has visited the White House so it should not be a problem. Personally I like CEOs going to Washington and educating politicians about the importance of semiconductors. It should be done as a constant reminder of how important we are. I'm still waiting for my invitation. :ROFLMAO:
 
I was surprised TSMC was not mentioned. TSMC has two fabs in China and they are doing some equipment updates according to 2025 CAPEX. But yes, CC Wei has visited the White House so it should not be a problem. Personally I like CEOs going to Washington and educating politicians about the importance of semiconductors. It should be done as a constant reminder of how important we are. I'm still waiting for my invitation. :ROFLMAO:
Or which Michelin restaurants and how many free dinners are still under negotiation.

Now TSMC's Nanjing fab has been removed from the US government's VEU list.

 
Applying for a license isnt that rare for anything in China. the question is whether they will grant the license.

In 10 years, when China is making all the equipment that the US used to make, people will ask "how did this happen?" The answer is "We told them to develop their own technology and not buy from the US"
 
Applying for a license isnt that rare for anything in China. the question is whether they will grant the license.

In 10 years, when China is making all the equipment that the US used to make, people will ask "how did this happen?" The answer is "We told them to develop their own technology and not buy from the US"
Yeah I think western semi equipment suppliers are going to find themselves in a very tight spot in a few years. I think it'll be less than 10 years.
 
Applying for a license isnt that rare for anything in China. the question is whether they will grant the license.

In 10 years, when China is making all the equipment that the US used to make, people will ask "how did this happen?" The answer is "We told them to develop their own technology and not buy from the US"

I would rather name it "homeopathic sanctions"

You can see it with Russia very vividly. Rather than slaying it's industry in one go, DC kept playing weird carrot and stick games with Russians since their attempt at Georgia.

Eventually, they learned to exploit that to do an orderly transition from Western industrial supplies, and save their military industry.

I think the same will be true for the current intentionally weakened, backdoor compromised sanctions on PRC.

If you decide to not to punch the enemy too hard in hopes of the enemy returning gratitude, the enemy will just get accustomed to weak punches, and return with double the grudge, and not gratitude, when he recovers.
 
Let say Hynix puts equipment in its fab in China without a license. What happens and to whom?

Depends on who will sell that equipment to them. Second hand equipment vendors are completely out of jurisdictional reach, if they are set up in third countries.

If it will be AM USA selling them directly, then AM execs theoretically end up in court.
 
Depends on who will sell that equipment to them. Second hand equipment vendors are completely out of jurisdictional reach, if they are set up in third countries.

If it will be AM USA selling them directly, then AM execs theoretically end up in court.
good input. I do know of companies who have shipped to one location and then moved it later for certain reasons.
 
Applying for a license isnt that rare for anything in China. the question is whether they will grant the license.

In 10 years, when China is making all the equipment that the US used to make, people will ask "how did this happen?" The answer is "We told them to develop their own technology and not buy from the US"
Does this apply to car/EV cars because the US didn't ban anything related to cars, as far as I know, and China took the lead in the EV car market. This logic seems flawed, doesn't it?
 
Yeah I think western semi equipment suppliers are going to find themselves in a very tight spot in a few years. I think it'll be less than 10 years.

Now that TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix have all been removed from the US government’s EVU list, will they one day just turn off the lights, shut down all the fab equipment, and go home?

TSMC alone has invested about $6 billion in its Nanjing fab on 16nm and 28nm nodes. Is the US government going to compensate for such losses? I think the chance is zero.

But does this mean TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix will be forced to rely more on PRC made equipment to keep their multibillion dollar investments alive?

Is Trump, in effect, becoming the top promoter of PRC made semiconductor manufacturing equipment?
 
Back
Top