Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/threads/can-intel-recover-even-part-of-their-past-dominance.23972/
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2030770
[XFI] => 1060170
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
Guests have limited access.
Join our community today!
Join our community today!
You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Can Intel recover even part of their past dominance?
- Thread starter Arthur Hanson
- Start date
MKWVentures
Moderator
you dont recover glory. The gain new glory.
Intel was a dominant execution engine in the past with no competitor who could succeed. those days are gone.
yes the brand gives them an advantage.... but that brand has new characteristics now.
just an opinion.
Intel was a dominant execution engine in the past with no competitor who could succeed. those days are gone.
yes the brand gives them an advantage.... but that brand has new characteristics now.
just an opinion.
Intel is still dominant in business computers. I suspect this is due to decades of contracts embedding them into long term work; however, that wont last forever.
Intel's issue is going to continue to be cost and profit. It doesn't do much good to have the majority of the market share if you are bleeding money to do it.
AMD seems content (at present) to continue the march to gobble up as much of a % of the really profitable segments (DC, HEDT) as they can before putting the full court press on OEM (where they will be forced to sell at a much lower margin).
For Intel to return to its days of glory, it must find a way to make a profit. Every layoff depletes Intel's future ability to dominate.
I personally believe that they will need to re-focus their efforts on design and spin off the foundry. Intel can't survive on their own chips alone in foundry. The equipment has gotten too expensive.
Intel's issue is going to continue to be cost and profit. It doesn't do much good to have the majority of the market share if you are bleeding money to do it.
AMD seems content (at present) to continue the march to gobble up as much of a % of the really profitable segments (DC, HEDT) as they can before putting the full court press on OEM (where they will be forced to sell at a much lower margin).
For Intel to return to its days of glory, it must find a way to make a profit. Every layoff depletes Intel's future ability to dominate.
I personally believe that they will need to re-focus their efforts on design and spin off the foundry. Intel can't survive on their own chips alone in foundry. The equipment has gotten too expensive.
siliconbruh999
Well-known member
You know that Foundry is what's keeping them market share and IFS alone is not the only problem design is as well and AMD is benifiting off of Intel's Software Efforts.I personally believe that they will need to re-focus their efforts on design and spin off the foundry. Intel can't survive on their own chips alone in foundry. The equipment has gotten too expensive.
AMD is still getting freebie from Intel they are not contributing meaningful to x86.
Not even x86-64 ?AMD is still getting freebie from Intel they are not contributing meaningful to x86.
siliconbruh999
Well-known member
i meant the software part AMD is very dependent on Intel Software Contribution there are numerous article where Intel doing OSS stuff is helping AMD as well but AMD doesn't contribute much in the kernel that benefit bothNot even x86-64 ?