siliconbruh999
Well-known member
One of the Intel PTL slides comparing the nearly same uARch on N3B and 18A as close as we can get
Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/threads/n3b-lion-cove-in-lnl-vs-18a-cougar-cove-lnc.23763/
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2030770
[XFI] => 1060170
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
View attachment 3724
One of the Intel PTL slides comparing the nearly same uARch on N3B and 18A as close as we can get
Estimated performance * estimated power * estimated architecture differences = ???so 18a is 10% higher performance than N3B at given power. Is that correct?
I agree. That chart looks really suspicious. I think that would have made even Gelsinger blush.Estimated performance * estimated power * estimated architecture differences = ???.
Never trust a slide with unmarked axes. Instant lab fail when I was at school and university. Also, why do they use the wording "at similar performance/power" ? The normal wording would be "higher performance at the same power".I agree. That chart looks really suspicious. I think that would have made even Gelsinger blush.
Yes or 40% lower power at the same performanceso 18a is 10% higher performance than N3B at given power. Is that correct?
Lawyers..... companies have lawyers check these items now LOLNever trust a slide with unmarked axes. Instant lab fail when I was at school and university. Also, why do they use the wording "at similar performance/power" ? The normal wording would be "higher performance at the same power".
