Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?search/243110/&c[users]=schemmel&o=date
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Search results

  1. S

    Beleaguered Intel delays its 7nm chips yet again, now expected in 2022 or 2023 ?!?!?

    Dear Daniel, you should know better than cite a source that does not know that Intel 7nm is not the same than TSMC 7nm. I think the most unfortunate decision from Intel was to stay honest with the nm when transitioning from effective gate length to calculated gate lenth equivalent. Nearly half...
  2. S

    Along came a trojan? GDSII vs Silicon check

    you have to do the LVS on the manufactured silicon -> therefore my term "physical", i.e. using FIB or similar methods to reconstruct the manufactured circuit structure. I am not sure how feasible this is from a technological point of view, but to my knowledge it would be the only reliable way to...
  3. S

    Along came a trojan? GDSII vs Silicon check

    If the foundry is compromised, the jobview and similar reports from the foundry will not help. A physical LVS is the only safe solution (and you have to repeat it continuously during the time the ASIC is in production.
Back
Top