siliconbruh999
Well-known member
If the dude really did something than he would sell his entire stock before moving to Intel but he didn't.
Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/threads/tsmc-formally-sues-ex-svp-over-alleged-transfer-of-secrets-to-intel.24088/page-6
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2030770
[XFI] => 1060170
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
If the dude really did something than he would sell his entire stock before moving to Intel but he didn't.
If the dude really did something than he would sell his entire stock before moving to Intel but he didn't.
You can't do such a switch just in a moment he must have thought of somethingYou raise a good point - but it's also possible that this process precluded him selling in time before switching over to Intel.
Yes but so far there hasn't been proof even the raid didn't found any evidenceIt might be important, but it might also be irrelevant. In a criminal investigation, the most important factor is what a person actually DID.
As I understand, the restrictions on high executives stock sales are there to preventt insider trading. Once he was out, he was not privy to internal TSMC information. Would he still be constrained in stock sales?He was a pretty high up executive; stock sales (at least in the US) often require disclosure and to be scheduled (months?) in advance.
You raise a good point - but it's also possible that this process precluded him selling in time before switching over to Intel.
every country has different law so maybe there is a cooldown period or somethingAs I understand, the restrictions on high executives stock sales are there to preventt insider trading. Once he was out, he was not privy to internal TSMC information. Would he still be constrained in stock sales?
100% agree.It’s hard to imagine there’s no vetting procedure at Intel before being hired at such a rank that includes at least one call to TSMC HQ to double check…
I think Intel already knew his employment history. What was there to confirm? Do you think TSMC called Intel when he moved from Intel to TSMC?It’s hard to imagine there’s no vetting procedure at Intel before being hired at such a rank that includes at least one call to TSMC HQ to double check…
Have you ever heard about classified personal notes? I am curious what the company's process for such classification would be.100% agree.
Only explaination is that TSMC people reported him taking classified documents AFTER they heard he was hired at Intel.
Taking classified documents by people leaving their job has happened before. Maybe he has the documents stored in his Garage in Delaware or at Mar-a-lago. Special council to be named depending on Wei Jens political party (KMT/DPP)![]()
![]()
For low ranks or at most middle management, which I assume he was at back then, probably not as a vetting procedure. But calling informally, water cooler questions, and the like, certainly possible.I think Intel already knew his employment history. What was there to confirm? Do you think TSMC called Intel when he moved from Intel to TSMC?
Words directly from Lai—people can decide for themselves whether to take messages from the Taiwanese government seriously:That’s one point of view. But what about the people here who say that most people in Taiwan would support independence—given that the large-scale recalls of KMT-elected officials ended in a major failure? Do they call their own views “shit,” then?
If Taiwan doesn’t have the capability to defend itself, it should stop pretending and dragging other countries into the mess.
The nuclear argument is somewhat valid, given the recent actions of the Japanese leadership.
![]()
Japan edges towards hosting nuclear weapons | The Strategist
It looks like Japan will finally cast aside its ban on hosting nuclear weapons—specifically, those of the United States. Moving towards action she called for last year, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is reviewing the three principles that have ...www.aspistrategist.org.au
i doubt you will be a middle manager after 18Year at a companyFor low ranks or at most middle management, which I assume he was at back then, probably not as a vetting procedure. But calling informally, water cooler questions, and the like, certainly possible.
The position of Dr. Wei-Jen Lo at Intel when he left the company to join TSMC in 2004 was Director of Technology Development and as a Factory Manager running a development facility in Santa Clara, California.i doubt you will be a middle manager after 18Year at a company
Why's everyone bringing this to country level? It's IP issue between company and ex-employee, could happen anywhere, and internationally recognized everywhere. If TSMC were wrong, WJL could counter-sue.TSMC and Taiwan should tread very carefully here. While it’s already been established that TSMC has a large range of options when it comes to retaliation to Intel, ultimately it’s the US that possesses escalation dominance here. And Trump will most certainly be unsympathetic to TSMC.
One Taiwanese news program mentioned WJL seldom use computer and he has a habit to use hand written notes. Therefore, I also suspect it is very likely that TSM benefited enormously from from WJL's experience at Intel. Also when Intel's employees joined TSM such as Kevin Zhang, Intel's progress plans/difficulties could be likely leaked out which would allow TSM to devise plans to catch up with Intel.The position of Dr. Wei-Jen Lo at Intel when he left the company to join TSMC in 2004 was Director of Technology Development and as a Factory Manager running a development facility in Santa Clara, California.
It's also internationally recognised everywhere because of US technology and commercial dominance. They write the rules and get everyone else (with perhaps a partial exception in China) to follow them. We may sometimes resent this outside the US, but life would be far more chaotic and unpredictable if someone wasn't enforcing a standard.Why's everyone bringing this to country level? It's IP issue between company and ex-employee, could happen anywhere, and internationally recognized everywhere. If TSMC were wrong, WJL could counter-sue.
