You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!




Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: 10nm yield problems

  1. #11
    Top Influencer
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    304
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 129
    Given: 67
    This is the full quote from Andrew Lu's facebook page:
    Does Samsung Lead TSMC 10nm Ramp by 3 Months and Cut TSMC’s Mid-Node Advantages on 8/​6nm Introductions?
    Last week, Samsung announced to have shipped more than 70,000 wafers of its first-generation 10nm LPE (Low Power Early) to date with a steady high yield to meet customer needs. Samsung Electronics has also announced the addition of the 8nm and the 6nm process technologies to its current process roadmap of 10nm and 7nm.
    If Samsung is telling us the truth, Samsung is leading ahead of TSMC on 10nm ramp for a quarter (vs. Samsung's lead on 14nm ramp for six months). Thus, the next check point is if Samsung is able to ship its Galaxy S8 globally before end of May 2017.
    Also, different from most of the foundries, TSMC often introduced its mid-node technology like 12nm in between of 10/16nm and 22nm in between of 20/28nm to gain its competitiveness on performance and cost. However, if Samsung is also introducing its mid-node like 8nm in between of 7/10nm and 6nm in between of 5/7nm to compete with TSMC's mid-node, this leaves little room for TSMC to gain any technology edge.
    He hasn't heard about TSMC's 7nm+ then. That would be equivalent to Samsung's 6nm.
    Samsung have 8nm, but they don't have 12nm, or 22nm - so overall not very clear that they are ahead.
    (BTW. 12nm is not "between 10/16nm", it's a 6T version of 16nm and 22nm is not "between 20 and 28nm". 22nm is a improved version of 28nm)

    0 Not allowed!
     

  2. #12
    Admin Daniel Nenni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    3,592
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 566
    Given: 1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by lefty View Post
    This is the full quote from Andrew Lu's facebook page:

    He hasn't heard about TSMC's 7nm+ then. That would be equivalent to Samsung's 6nm.
    Samsung have 8nm, but they don't have 12nm, or 22nm - so overall not very clear that they are ahead.
    (BTW. 12nm is not "between 10/16nm", it's a 6T version of 16nm and 22nm is not "between 20 and 28nm". 22nm is a improved version of 28nm)
    22nm is an optical shrink of 28nm. Just like 55nm is an optical shrink from 65nm. This really is a clever marketing move by TSMC. 12nm is not an optical shrink so work will have to be done to get a design moved over.

    I read the Andrew Lu piece and found it to be complete nonsense. Tom Dillinger will be posting his Top Ten from the TSMC Symposium so look for that this week. There were some definite nuggets that the mainstream media missed.

    D.A.N.

    1 Not allowed!
    Now available in print or Kindle: "Mobile Unleashed: The Origin and Evolution of ARM Processors In Our Devices"

  3. #13
    Top Influencer
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    304
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 129
    Given: 67
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Nenni View Post
    22nm is an optical shrink of 28nm. Just like 55nm is an optical shrink from 65nm.
    That's good to know.
    One thing I forgot, is that Samsung is meant to be using gate all around transistors for 7nm. That is something that could give them an edge

    0 Not allowed!
     

  4. #14
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    The land of beer and chocolate
    Posts
    860
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 210
    Given: 253
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Nenni View Post
    This really is a clever marketing move by TSMC.
    I don't like it, it makes my engineering heart bleed. Also some double standards seem to be at play here on SemiWiki; sometimes it's called 'alternative facts' and sometimes 'clever'.

    0 Not allowed!
    Trust me ...
    I know what I am doing.

  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Nenni View Post
    22nm is an optical shrink of 28nm. Just like 55nm is an optical shrink from 65nm. This really is a clever marketing move by TSMC. 12nm is not an optical shrink so work will have to be done to get a design moved over.

    I read the Andrew Lu piece and found it to be complete nonsense. Tom Dillinger will be posting his Top Ten from the TSMC Symposium so look for that this week. There were some definite nuggets that the mainstream media missed.

    D.A.N.
    28nm is already an optical shrink of 32nm ... is that the first time in the industry that a node is shrunk twice ?

    0 Not allowed!
     

  6. #16
    Admin Daniel Nenni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    3,592
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 566
    Given: 1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by simoncc2 View Post
    28nm is already an optical shrink of 32nm ... is that the first time in the industry that a node is shrunk twice ?
    28nm is not a shrink, it is HKMG. TSMC did not even do a 32nm, they went from 40nm to 28nm HKMG. Maybe they will shrink 40nm to 32m ULP for IoT but probably not.

    0 Not allowed!
    Now available in print or Kindle: "Mobile Unleashed: The Origin and Evolution of ARM Processors In Our Devices"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •